Wednesday, May 28, 2008

So I posted that I feel dumb some days, but when I wrote that, it was related to how frustrated I was trying to figure out System Center Virtual Machine Manager 2008 Beta.  I thought that I had be shown the light by someone in the product team posting detailed instructions on how to do what I was trying to accomplish.  I would just like to set the record straight and say that IT STILL DIDN'T WORK!

Now I am running Hyper-V RC1 so SCVMM 2008 Beta doesn't work with that yet anyway...  Ah, the joys of life on the bleeding edge....

Wednesday, May 28, 2008 9:40:29 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0]
 Friday, September 28, 2007

 I was working with a colleague to figure out something related to connection speeds and data transfer.  I happened to find this interesting little snippet and thought it was worth reading:

Historical context*
Once upon a time, computer professionals noticed that 210 was very nearly equal to 1000 and started using the SI prefix "kilo" to mean 1024. That worked well enough for a decade or two because everybody who talked kilobytes knew that the term implied 1024 bytes. But, almost overnight a much more numerous "everybody" bought computers, and the trade computer professionals needed to talk to physicists and engineers and even to ordinary people, most of whom know that a kilometer is 1000 meters and a kilogram is 1000 grams.

Then data storage for gigabytes, and even terabytes, became practical, and the storage devices were not constructed on binary trees, which meant that, for many practical purposes, binary arithmetic was less convenient than decimal arithmetic. The result is that today "everybody" does not "know" what a megabyte is. When discussing computer memory, most manufacturers use megabyte to mean 220 = 1 048 576 bytes, but the manufacturers of computer storage devices usually use the term to mean 1 000 000 bytes. Some designers of local area networks have used megabit per second to mean 1 048 576 bit/s, but all telecommunications engineers use it to mean 106 bit/s. And if two definitions of the megabyte are not enough, a third megabyte of 1 024 000 bytes is the megabyte used to format the familiar 90 mm (3 1/2 inch), "1.44 MB" diskette. The confusion is real, as is the potential for incompatibility in standards and in implemented systems.

Faced with this reality, the IEEE Standards Board decided that IEEE standards will use the conventional, internationally adopted, definitions of the SI prefixes. Mega will mean 1 000 000, except that the base-two definition may be used (if such usage is explicitly pointed out on a case-by-case basis) until such time that prefixes for binary multiples are adopted by an appropriate standards body. 

Return to SI prefixes

*Historical context adapted from: Bruce Barrow, "A Lesson in Megabytes," IEEE Standards Bearer, January 1997, page 5. Portions copyright © 1997 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.

Definitions of the SI units: The binary prefixes

Friday, September 28, 2007 7:06:37 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0]
 Friday, August 24, 2007

 Now this is funny...  you can buy your own chain mail shirt....

Tips on Wearing Your New Chain Mail:
In case you weren't aware, chain mail does not stretch. You cannot put it on one arm at a time like a fabric shirt. Instead lay the chain mail flat on the ground, bend over and thrust both arms into the bottom of the shirt. Work your hands through to the end of the sleeves and then begin to stand-up. Get your head through the neck hole and let the chain mail slide down your body. If you have long hair, make sure to tie up your hair before you wear the chain mail. Otherwise it could get tangled in your hair. You might feel a bit claustrophobic when first wearing the chain mail... but don't worry you won't get stuck. PLEASE wear a shirt or some other garment underneath the chain mail. The edges of the rings where they are joined together are a bit rough and can scratch you.

ThinkGeek :: The ThinkGeek Chain Mail T-Shirt

Friday, August 24, 2007 10:05:43 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0]
 Thursday, July 05, 2007

So when I tried to install the update that I downloaded in my earlier post, I got the following message:

The product instance SQL Tools has had update 3054 installed. You do not need to install this update. An update equal to or greater than 3159 should be downloaded.

Isn't that special... 

Guess I need to do some more searching...

Thursday, July 05, 2007 11:10:07 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0]
 Thursday, October 05, 2006

I was looking around and found a blog entry that stipulates that Windows 3.1 is still alive.

http://bink.nu/photos/news_article_images/category1022/picture13552.aspx

Silliness prevails it seems.

Thursday, October 05, 2006 7:27:07 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0]